Question Details
A. A data analyst is studying the factors affecting employee productivity in a technology company. The analyst collects the following data from 4 employees over a specific period:
Employee Training Hours Break Hours Productivity Score 1 5 2 60 2 10 2 68 3 15 1 78 4 20 1 88
Determine which independent variable - Training Hours or Break Hours - has a stronger relationship with the Productivity Score. Support your answer using an appropriate correlation measure. (10 marks)
B. A company has 8 employees and wants to select 3 employees to attend a training program. The order in which the employees are selected does not matter. How many different groups of 3 employees can be selected? (5 marks)
C. The daily water consumption of households in a city is normally distributed with a mean of 180 litres and a variance of 400 litres square. What is the probability that a randomly selected household consumes more than 215 litres in a day? Assume given P(Z ≤ 1.75) = 0.9599. (5 marks)
Model Answer
A. Correlation Analysis: Training Hours vs. Break Hours on Productivity (10 Marks)
1. Appropriate Measure of Correlation (1 Mark)
The appropriate metric is Pearson's Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (r r r ) , which evaluates the strength and direction of the linear relationship between continuous/ratio scale quantitative variables:
r = ∑ ( X i − X ˉ ) ( Y i − Y ˉ ) ∑ ( X i − X ˉ ) 2 ∑ ( Y i − Y ˉ ) 2 r = \frac{\sum (X_i - \bar{X})(Y_i - \bar{Y})}{\sqrt{\sum (X_i - \bar{X})^2 \sum (Y_i - \bar{Y})^2}} r = ∑ ( X i − X ˉ ) 2 ∑ ( Y i − Y ˉ ) 2 ∑ ( X i − X ˉ ) ( Y i − Y ˉ )
2. Variable Definitions & Sample Means (2 Marks)
Let:
X 1 X_1 X 1 : Training Hours
X 2 X_2 X 2 : Break Hours
Y Y Y : Productivity Score
Sample size: n = 4 n = 4 n = 4
Calculating Means:
X ˉ 1 = 5 + 10 + 15 + 20 4 = 50 4 = 12.5 \bar{X}_1 = \frac{5 + 10 + 15 + 20}{4} = \frac{50}{4} = \mathbf{12.5} X ˉ 1 = 4 5 + 10 + 15 + 20 = 4 50 = 12.5
X ˉ 2 = 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 4 = 6 4 = 1.5 \bar{X}_2 = \frac{2 + 2 + 1 + 1}{4} = \frac{6}{4} = \mathbf{1.5} X ˉ 2 = 4 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 4 6 = 1.5
Y ˉ = 60 + 68 + 78 + 88 4 = 294 4 = 73.5 \bar{Y} = \frac{60 + 68 + 78 + 88}{4} = \frac{294}{4} = \mathbf{73.5} Y ˉ = 4 60 + 68 + 78 + 88 = 4 294 = 73.5
3. Step-by-Step Computation Table (3 Marks)
Emp X 1 X_1 X 1 X 2 X_2 X 2 Y Y Y ( X 1 − X ˉ 1 ) (X_1 - \bar{X}_1) ( X 1 − X ˉ 1 ) ( X 1 − X ˉ 1 ) 2 (X_1 - \bar{X}_1)^2 ( X 1 − X ˉ 1 ) 2 ( X 2 − X ˉ 2 ) (X_2 - \bar{X}_2) ( X 2 − X ˉ 2 ) ( X 2 − X ˉ 2 ) 2 (X_2 - \bar{X}_2)^2 ( X 2 − X ˉ 2 ) 2 ( Y − Y ˉ ) (Y - \bar{Y}) ( Y − Y ˉ ) ( Y − Y ˉ ) 2 (Y - \bar{Y})^2 ( Y − Y ˉ ) 2 ( X 1 − X ˉ 1 ) ( Y − Y ˉ ) (X_1 - \bar{X}_1)(Y - \bar{Y}) ( X 1 − X ˉ 1 ) ( Y − Y ˉ ) ( X 2 − X ˉ 2 ) ( Y − Y ˉ ) (X_2 - \bar{X}_2)(Y - \bar{Y}) ( X 2 − X ˉ 2 ) ( Y − Y ˉ ) 1 5 2 60 − 7.5 -7.5 − 7.5 56.25 56.25 56.25 + 0.5 +0.5 + 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 − 13.5 -13.5 − 13.5 182.25 182.25 182.25 + 101.25 +101.25 + 101.25 − 6.75 -6.75 − 6.75 2 10 2 68 − 2.5 -2.5 − 2.5 6.25 6.25 6.25 + 0.5 +0.5 + 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 − 5.5 -5.5 − 5.5 30.25 30.25 30.25 + 13.75 +13.75 + 13.75 − 2.75 -2.75 − 2.75 3 15 1 78 + 2.5 +2.5 + 2.5 6.25 6.25 6.25 − 0.5 -0.5 − 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 + 4.5 +4.5 + 4.5 20.25 20.25 20.25 + 11.25 +11.25 + 11.25 − 2.25 -2.25 − 2.25 4 20 1 88 + 7.5 +7.5 + 7.5 56.25 56.25 56.25 − 0.5 -0.5 − 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 + 14.5 +14.5 + 14.5 210.25 210.25 210.25 + 108.75 +108.75 + 108.75 − 7.25 -7.25 − 7.25 ∑ \sum ∑ 50 50 50 6 6 6 294 294 294 0.0 0.0 0.0 125.0 125.0 125.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 443.0 443.0 443.0 + 235.0 +235.0 + 235.0 − 19.0 -19.0 − 19.0
4. Correlation 1: Training Hours (X 1 X_1 X 1 ) vs. Productivity Score (Y Y Y ) (2 Marks)
r ( X 1 , Y ) = ∑ ( X 1 − X ˉ 1 ) ( Y − Y ˉ ) ∑ ( X 1 − X ˉ 1 ) 2 ⋅ ∑ ( Y − Y ˉ ) 2 r(X_1, Y) = \frac{\sum (X_1 - \bar{X}_1)(Y - \bar{Y})}{\sqrt{\sum (X_1 - \bar{X}_1)^2 \cdot \sum (Y - \bar{Y})^2}} r ( X 1 , Y ) = ∑ ( X 1 − X ˉ 1 ) 2 ⋅ ∑ ( Y − Y ˉ ) 2 ∑ ( X 1 − X ˉ 1 ) ( Y − Y ˉ )
r ( X 1 , Y ) = 235.0 125.0 × 443.0 = 235.0 55375.0 = 235.0 235.3189 ≈ + 0.9986 r(X_1, Y) = \frac{235.0}{\sqrt{125.0 \times 443.0}} = \frac{235.0}{\sqrt{55375.0}} = \frac{235.0}{235.3189} \approx \mathbf{+0.9986} r ( X 1 , Y ) = 125.0 × 443.0 235.0 = 55375.0 235.0 = 235.3189 235.0 ≈ + 0.9986
Interpretation: There is an exceptionally strong, nearly perfect positive linear correlation between Training Hours and Productivity Score.
5. Correlation 2: Break Hours (X 2 X_2 X 2 ) vs. Productivity Score (Y Y Y ) (1 Mark)
r ( X 2 , Y ) = ∑ ( X 2 − X ˉ 2 ) ( Y − Y ˉ ) ∑ ( X 2 − X ˉ 2 ) 2 ⋅ ∑ ( Y − Y ˉ ) 2 r(X_2, Y) = \frac{\sum (X_2 - \bar{X}_2)(Y - \bar{Y})}{\sqrt{\sum (X_2 - \bar{X}_2)^2 \cdot \sum (Y - \bar{Y})^2}} r ( X 2 , Y ) = ∑ ( X 2 − X ˉ 2 ) 2 ⋅ ∑ ( Y − Y ˉ ) 2 ∑ ( X 2 − X ˉ 2 ) ( Y − Y ˉ )
r ( X 2 , Y ) = − 19.0 1.0 × 443.0 = − 19.0 443.0 = − 19.0 21.0476 ≈ − 0.9027 r(X_2, Y) = \frac{-19.0}{\sqrt{1.0 \times 443.0}} = \frac{-19.0}{\sqrt{443.0}} = \frac{-19.0}{21.0476} \approx \mathbf{-0.9027} r ( X 2 , Y ) = 1.0 × 443.0 − 19.0 = 443.0 − 19.0 = 21.0476 − 19.0 ≈ − 0.9027
Interpretation: There is a strong negative linear correlation between Break Hours and Productivity Score.
6. Determination of Stronger Relationship (1 Mark)
The strength of a relationship is evaluated by comparing the absolute values of the correlation coefficients (∣ r ∣ \lvert r \rvert ∣ r ∣ ):
Independent Variable Correlation (r r r ) Absolute Strength (∣ r ∣ \lvert r \rvert ∣ r ∣ ) Coefficient of Determination (R 2 R^2 R 2 ) Rank Training Hours (X 1 X_1 X 1 ) + 0.9986 +0.9986 + 0.9986 0.9986 0.9986 0.9986 ( 0.9986 ) 2 ≈ 99.73 % (0.9986)^2 \approx \mathbf{99.73\%} ( 0.9986 ) 2 ≈ 99.73% 1 (Stronger) Break Hours (X 2 X_2 X 2 ) − 0.9027 -0.9027 − 0.9027 0.9027 0.9027 0.9027 ( − 0.9027 ) 2 ≈ 81.49 % (-0.9027)^2 \approx \mathbf{81.49\%} ( − 0.9027 ) 2 ≈ 81.49% 2
Final Decision: Training Hours has a stronger relationship with the Productivity Score than Break Hours because ∣ r ( X 1 , Y ) ∣ = 0.9986 > ∣ r ( X 2 , Y ) ∣ = 0.9027 \lvert r(X_1, Y) \rvert = 0.9986 > \lvert r(X_2, Y) \rvert = 0.9027 ∣ r ( X 1 , Y )∣ = 0.9986 > ∣ r ( X 2 , Y )∣ = 0.9027 .
Statistical Rationale: Training Hours accounts for 99.73 % 99.73\% 99.73% of the variance in productivity, compared to 81.49 % 81.49\% 81.49% accounted for by Break Hours.
B. Combinatorics: Employee Selection (5 Marks)
1. Concept Identification (1 Mark)
Because the order of employee selection does not matter , the problem represents an unordered combination :
( n r ) = n C r \binom{n}{r} = {}^nC_r ( r n ) = n C r
( n r ) = n ! r ! ⋅ ( n − r ) ! \binom{n}{r} = \frac{n!}{r! \cdot (n - r)!} ( r n ) = r ! ⋅ ( n − r )! n !
3. Step-by-Step Calculation (3 Marks)
Total available employees: n = 8 n = 8 n = 8
Target group size: r = 3 r = 3 r = 3
( 8 3 ) = 8 ! 3 ! ⋅ ( 8 − 3 ) ! = 8 ! 3 ! ⋅ 5 ! \binom{8}{3} = \frac{8!}{3! \cdot (8 - 3)!} = \frac{8!}{3! \cdot 5!} ( 3 8 ) = 3 ! ⋅ ( 8 − 3 )! 8 ! = 3 ! ⋅ 5 ! 8 !
( 8 3 ) = 8 × 7 × 6 × 5 ! ( 3 × 2 × 1 ) × 5 ! \binom{8}{3} = \frac{8 \times 7 \times 6 \times 5!}{(3 \times 2 \times 1) \times 5!} ( 3 8 ) = ( 3 × 2 × 1 ) × 5 ! 8 × 7 × 6 × 5 !
( 8 3 ) = 8 × 7 × 6 6 = 8 × 7 = 56 \binom{8}{3} = \frac{8 \times 7 \times 6}{6} = 8 \times 7 = \mathbf{56} ( 3 8 ) = 6 8 × 7 × 6 = 8 × 7 = 56
Result: 56 different groups of 3 employees can be selected.
C. Normal Distribution: Household Water Consumption (5 Marks)
1. Given Parameters (1 Mark)
Let X X X denote the daily household water consumption in litres:
Distribution: X ∼ N ( μ , σ 2 ) X \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2) X ∼ N ( μ , σ 2 )
Population Mean: μ = 180 litres \mu = 180 \text{ litres} μ = 180 litres
Population Variance: σ 2 = 400 litres 2 \sigma^2 = 400 \text{ litres}^2 σ 2 = 400 litres 2
Population Standard Deviation: σ = 400 = 20 litres \sigma = \sqrt{400} = \mathbf{20 \text{ litres}} σ = 400 = 20 litres
Consumption Threshold: x = 215 litres x = 215 \text{ litres} x = 215 litres
Given Standard Normal Cumulative Probability: P ( Z ≤ 1.75 ) = 0.9599 P(Z \le 1.75) = 0.9599 P ( Z ≤ 1.75 ) = 0.9599
Converting the threshold value x = 215 x = 215 x = 215 into the standard normal variable Z ∼ N ( 0 , 1 ) Z \sim \mathcal{N}(0, 1) Z ∼ N ( 0 , 1 ) :
Z = X − μ σ Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma} Z = σ X − μ
Z = 215 − 180 20 = 35 20 = 1.75 Z = \frac{215 - 180}{20} = \frac{35}{20} = \mathbf{1.75} Z = 20 215 − 180 = 20 35 = 1.75
3. Probability Calculation (2 Marks)
We seek the probability of consuming more than 215 litres:
P ( X > 215 ) = P ( Z > 1.75 ) P(X > 215) = P(Z > 1.75) P ( X > 215 ) = P ( Z > 1.75 )
Applying the complement rule for cumulative probabilities:
P ( Z > 1.75 ) = 1 − P ( Z ≤ 1.75 ) P(Z > 1.75) = 1 - P(Z \le 1.75) P ( Z > 1.75 ) = 1 − P ( Z ≤ 1.75 )
Substituting the given value P ( Z ≤ 1.75 ) = 0.9599 P(Z \le 1.75) = 0.9599 P ( Z ≤ 1.75 ) = 0.9599 :
P ( X > 215 ) = 1 − 0.9599 = 0.0401 P(X > 215) = 1 - 0.9599 = \mathbf{0.0401} P ( X > 215 ) = 1 − 0.9599 = 0.0401
Final Result: The probability that a randomly selected household consumes more than 215 litres in a day is 0.0401 0.0401 0.0401 (or 4.01 % 4.01\% 4.01% ).