Skip to main content

CT1 Sample Questions — Batch 3: Probability Distributions & Bayes

This document provides rigorous, textbook-style solutions for the probability distribution and advanced Bayes' Theorem questions (Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, and Q21) from the IFS UNIT - 1 & 2 sample questions sheet. All formulas are rendered in LaTeX, with step-by-step mathematical derivations and formal academic inferences.


Question 10: Bayes' Theorem / Posterior Analysis of Electronic Devices​

Given Data​

Let X,Y,ZX, Y, Z represent the events that a produced device is of Type X, Type Y, or Type Z respectively. Let DD represent the event that a device is defective.

  • Defective conditional probabilities: P(D∣X)=0.01,P(D∣Y)=0.04,P(D∣Z)=0.02P(D \mid X) = 0.01, \quad P(D \mid Y) = 0.04, \quad P(D \mid Z) = 0.02
  • Posteriors of device type given a defective is found: P(X∣D)=0.5,P(Y∣D)=0.3,P(Z∣D)=0.2P(X \mid D) = 0.5, \quad P(Y \mid D) = 0.3, \quad P(Z \mid D) = 0.2

Analysis & Derivations​

The question asks: "If a defective device is picked up from the factory, what is the most likely type of device?"

Interpretation A: Direct Posterior Comparison (MAP Decision)​

If we are given that a defective device has been picked up from the factory, we are seeking to find the maximum posterior probability: argmax⁡k∈{X,Y,Z}P(k∣D)\operatorname{argmax}_{k \in \{X,Y,Z\}} P(k \mid D) Since the posteriors are explicitly provided in the problem statement:

  • P(X∣D)=0.5P(X \mid D) = 0.5 (or 50%50\%)
  • P(Y∣D)=0.3P(Y \mid D) = 0.3 (or 30%30\%)
  • P(Z∣D)=0.2P(Z \mid D) = 0.2 (or 20%20\%)

Conclusion A: Type X is the most likely type of device among the defectives, with a probability of 0.50.5.


Interpretation B: Deriving the Production Proportions (Priors)​

To demonstrate advanced mastery, we can derive the overall production proportions (the priors P(X),P(Y),P(Z)P(X), P(Y), P(Z)) to see which device type the factory produces the most.

According to Bayes' Theorem: P(k∣D)=P(D∣k)P(k)P(D)  ⟹  P(k)=P(k∣D)P(D)P(D∣k)P(k \mid D) = \frac{P(D \mid k)P(k)}{P(D)} \implies P(k) = \frac{P(k \mid D)P(D)}{P(D \mid k)} Let P(D)=cP(D) = c represent the total probability of a defective device (constant). P(X)=0.5⋅c0.01=50cP(X) = \frac{0.5 \cdot c}{0.01} = 50c P(Y)=0.3⋅c0.04=7.5cP(Y) = \frac{0.3 \cdot c}{0.04} = 7.5c P(Z)=0.2⋅c0.02=10cP(Z) = \frac{0.2 \cdot c}{0.02} = 10c

Since the probabilities must sum to 1 (P(X)+P(Y)+P(Z)=1P(X) + P(Y) + P(Z) = 1): 50c+7.5c+10c=1  ⟹  67.5c=1  ⟹  c=167.5=213550c + 7.5c + 10c = 1 \implies 67.5c = 1 \implies c = \frac{1}{67.5} = \frac{2}{135}

Now, substitute cc back to find the exact priors:

  • Prior of Type X: P(X)=50×2135=100135=2027≈0.7407(74.07%)P(X) = 50 \times \frac{2}{135} = \frac{100}{135} = \frac{20}{27} \approx 0.7407 \quad (74.07\%)
  • Prior of Type Y: P(Y)=7.5×2135=15135=327=19≈0.1111(11.11%)P(Y) = 7.5 \times \frac{2}{135} = \frac{15}{135} = \frac{3}{27} = \frac{1}{9} \approx 0.1111 \quad (11.11\%)
  • Prior of Type Z: P(Z)=10×2135=20135=427≈0.1481(14.81%)P(Z) = 10 \times \frac{2}{135} = \frac{20}{135} = \frac{4}{27} \approx 0.1481 \quad (14.81\%)

Conclusion B: If the question refers to the overall production volume of the factory, Type X is the most likely type of device produced by the factory, accounting for approximately 74.07%74.07\% of total production.


Question 11: Bayes' Theorem / Posterior Analysis of Food Products​

Given Data​

Let D,E,FD, E, F represent the events that an inspected food product is of Type D, Type E, or Type F respectively. Let DefDef represent the event that a product is defective.

  • Defective conditional probabilities: P(Def∣D)=0.03,P(Def∣E)=0.01,P(Def∣F)=0.04P(Def \mid D) = 0.03, \quad P(Def \mid E) = 0.01, \quad P(Def \mid F) = 0.04
  • Posteriors of product type given a defective is found: P(D∣Def)=0.2,P(E∣Def)=0.5,P(F∣Def)=0.3P(D \mid Def) = 0.2, \quad P(E \mid Def) = 0.5, \quad P(F \mid Def) = 0.3

Analysis & Derivations​

The question asks: "If a defective product is selected, what is the most likely type of food product it belongs to?"

Interpretation A: Direct Posterior Comparison (MAP Decision)​

Since we are given that a defective product has been selected, we compare the given posterior probabilities:

  • P(D∣Def)=0.2P(D \mid Def) = 0.2 (or 20%20\%)
  • P(E∣Def)=0.5P(E \mid Def) = 0.5 (or 50%50\%)
  • P(F∣Def)=0.3P(F \mid Def) = 0.3 (or 30%30\%)

Conclusion A: Type E is the most likely type of food product to have been selected among defectives, with a probability of 0.50.5.


Interpretation B: Deriving the Production Proportions (Priors)​

Let us compute the total production distribution (the priors P(D),P(E),P(F)P(D), P(E), P(F)) across the factory.

According to Bayes' Theorem: P(k)=P(k∣Def)P(Def)P(Def∣k)P(k) = \frac{P(k \mid Def)P(Def)}{P(Def \mid k)} Let P(Def)=cP(Def) = c represent the total probability of a defective product. P(D)=0.2⋅c0.03=203c=8012cP(D) = \frac{0.2 \cdot c}{0.03} = \frac{20}{3}c = \frac{80}{12}c P(E)=0.5⋅c0.01=50c=60012cP(E) = \frac{0.5 \cdot c}{0.01} = 50c = \frac{600}{12}c P(F)=0.3⋅c0.04=304c=9012cP(F) = \frac{0.3 \cdot c}{0.04} = \frac{30}{4}c = \frac{90}{12}c

Summing the probabilities to 1: 80+600+9012c=1  ⟹  77012c=1  ⟹  c=12770=6385\frac{80 + 600 + 90}{12} c = 1 \implies \frac{770}{12}c = 1 \implies c = \frac{12}{770} = \frac{6}{385}

Now, substitute cc back to find the priors:

  • Prior of Type D: P(D)=8012×12770=80770=877≈0.1039(10.39%)P(D) = \frac{80}{12} \times \frac{12}{770} = \frac{80}{770} = \frac{8}{77} \approx 0.1039 \quad (10.39\%)
  • Prior of Type E: P(E)=60012×12770=600770=6077≈0.7792(77.92%)P(E) = \frac{600}{12} \times \frac{12}{770} = \frac{600}{770} = \frac{60}{77} \approx 0.7792 \quad (77.92\%)
  • Prior of Type F: P(F)=9012×12770=90770=977≈0.1169(11.69%)P(F) = \frac{90}{12} \times \frac{12}{770} = \frac{90}{770} = \frac{9}{77} \approx 0.1169 \quad (11.69\%)

Conclusion B: If the question refers to the overall production volume, Type E is the most likely type of food product produced by the facility, accounting for approximately 77.92%77.92\% of total production.


Question 12: Poisson Distribution - Fire Alarm Activations​

Given Data​

Let XX denote the number of fire alarm activations in a week.

  • Average rate of activation (λ\lambda) = 22 activations/week
  • Distribution model: X∼Pois⁡(λ=2)X \sim \operatorname{Pois}(\lambda = 2)

We seek the probability of exactly 3 alarm activations in a week: P(X=3)P(X = 3).


Step-by-Step Derivation​

The Probability Mass Function (PMF) of a Poisson random variable is: P(X=x)=e−λλxx!P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^x}{x!}

Substitute λ=2\lambda = 2 and x=3x = 3: P(X=3)=e−2233!P(X = 3) = \frac{e^{-2} 2^3}{3!} P(X=3)=e−2×86=43e−2P(X = 3) = \frac{e^{-2} \times 8}{6} = \frac{4}{3} e^{-2}

Using the approximation e−2≈0.135335e^{-2} \approx 0.135335: P(X=3)≈43×0.135335≈0.180447P(X = 3) \approx \frac{4}{3} \times 0.135335 \approx 0.180447

Inference: The probability that exactly 3 fire alarms will activate in a given week is approximately 18.04%18.04\%.


Question 13: Poisson Distribution - Coffee Shop Customer Arrivals​

Given Data​

Let XX denote the number of customers arriving at a coffee shop in a given hour.

  • Average rate of arrival (λ\lambda) = 1010 customers/hour
  • Distribution model: X∼Pois⁡(λ=10)X \sim \operatorname{Pois}(\lambda = 10)

We seek the probability of exactly 15 customer arrivals in an hour: P(X=15)P(X = 15).


Step-by-Step Derivation​

Using the Poisson PMF: P(X=x)=e−λλxx!P(X = x) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^x}{x!}

Substitute λ=10\lambda = 10 and x=15x = 15: P(X=15)=e−10101515!P(X = 15) = \frac{e^{-10} 10^{15}}{15!}

Given:

  • 1015=101510^{15} = 10^{15}
  • 15!=1,307,674,368,000=1.307674368×101215! = 1,307,674,368,000 = 1.307674368 \times 10^{12}
  • e−10≈0.0000453999e^{-10} \approx 0.0000453999

Substitute these numerical values: P(X=15)≈0.0000453999×10151.307674368×1012=4.53999×10101.307674368×1012P(X = 15) \approx \frac{0.0000453999 \times 10^{15}}{1.307674368 \times 10^{12}} = \frac{4.53999 \times 10^{10}}{1.307674368 \times 10^{12}} P(X=15)≈4.53999130.7674368≈0.034718P(X = 15) \approx \frac{4.53999}{130.7674368} \approx 0.034718

Inference: The probability that exactly 15 customers arrive in a given hour is approximately 3.47%3.47\%.


Question 21: Defective Bulbs - Binomial vs. Hypergeometric Models​

Given Data​

  • Total production batch size (NN) = 10001000
  • Probability of a bulb being defective (pp) = 0.010.01
  • Number of defective bulbs in the run (DD) = 1000×0.01=101000 \times 0.01 = 10
  • Number of non-defective bulbs (N−DN - D) = 990990
  • Sample size selected (nn) = 22

Let XX denote the number of defective bulbs in our sample of size 22. We solve this using both standard models to ensure complete accuracy.


Model 1: Binomial Distribution (With Replacement Approximation)​

Since NN is large relative to nn, we can model this as X∼Bin⁡(n=2,p=0.01)X \sim \operatorname{Bin}(n=2, p=0.01).

1. Probability that both are defective (P(X=2)P(X = 2))​

P(X=2)=(22)p2(1−p)0=(0.01)2=0.0001P(X = 2) = \binom{2}{2} p^2 (1-p)^0 = (0.01)^2 = 0.0001

2. Probability that both are non-defective (P(X=0)P(X = 0))​

P(X=0)=(20)p0(1−p)2=(0.99)2=0.9801P(X = 0) = \binom{2}{0} p^0 (1-p)^2 = (0.99)^2 = 0.9801

3. Probability that one is defective and the other is non-defective (P(X=1)P(X = 1))​

P(X=1)=(21)p1(1−p)1=2×0.01×0.99=0.0198P(X = 1) = \binom{2}{1} p^1 (1-p)^1 = 2 \times 0.01 \times 0.99 = 0.0198


Model 2: Hypergeometric Distribution (Exact Without Replacement)​

Since the bulbs are drawn without replacement from a finite batch of 10001000, the exact model is X∼Hypergeom⁡(N=1000,D=10,n=2)X \sim \operatorname{Hypergeom}(N=1000, D=10, n=2). P(X=x)=(Dx)(N−Dn−x)(Nn)P(X = x) = \frac{\binom{D}{x}\binom{N-D}{n-x}}{\binom{N}{n}}

Total combinations of choosing 2 bulbs out of 1000: (10002)=1000×9992=499500\binom{1000}{2} = \frac{1000 \times 999}{2} = 499500

1. Probability that both are defective (P(X=2)P(X = 2))​

P(X=2)=(102)(9900)499500=45×1499500=111100≈0.00009009P(X = 2) = \frac{\binom{10}{2}\binom{990}{0}}{499500} = \frac{45 \times 1}{499500} = \frac{1}{11100} \approx 0.00009009

2. Probability that both are non-defective (P(X=0)P(X = 0))​

P(X=0)=(100)(9902)499500=1×990×9892499500=489555499500=1087911100≈0.980090P(X = 0) = \frac{\binom{10}{0}\binom{990}{2}}{499500} = \frac{1 \times \frac{990 \times 989}{2}}{499500} = \frac{489555}{499500} = \frac{10879}{11100} \approx 0.980090

3. Probability that one is defective and the other is non-defective (P(X=1)P(X = 1))​

P(X=1)=(101)(9901)499500=10×990499500=9900499500=221110≈0.0198198P(X = 1) = \frac{\binom{10}{1}\binom{990}{1}}{499500} = \frac{10 \times 990}{499500} = \frac{9900}{499500} = \frac{22}{1110} \approx 0.0198198


Academic Summary of Results​

EventBinomial Model (Approx)Hypergeometric Model (Exact)
Both Defective0.0001000.000100 (0.01%0.01\%)0.0000900.000090 (0.009%0.009\%)
Both Non-Defective0.9801000.980100 (98.01%98.01\%)0.9800900.980090 (98.01%98.01\%)
One Defective, One Non-Defective0.0198000.019800 (1.98%1.98\%)0.0198200.019820 (1.982%1.982\%)

Exam tip: Mentioning both models in your answer shows exceptional depth. Explain that because the sample size (n=2n=2) is extremely small compared to the population (N=1000N=1000), the Binomial model is an incredibly accurate approximation of the exact Hypergeometric process.


Quick-Facts & Formula Sheet (Probability Distributions)​

Distribution ModelProbability Mass Function (PMF)Mean (μ\mu)Variance (σ2\sigma^2)Characteristics / Conditions
BinomialP(X=k)=(nk)pk(1−p)n−kP(X=k) = \binom{n}{k} p^k (1-p)^{n-k}npnpnp(1−p)np(1-p)nn trials; binary outcomes; independent; constant success probability pp.
PoissonP(X=x)=e−λλxx!P(X=x) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^x}{x!}λ\lambdaλ\lambdaRare event count; continuous interval; rate λ\lambda is constant; independence.
HypergeometricP(X=x)=(Dx)(N−Dn−x)(Nn)P(X=x) = \frac{\binom{D}{x}\binom{N-D}{n-x}}{\binom{N}{n}}n(DN)n \left(\frac{D}{N}\right)n(DN)(N−DN)(N−nN−1)n\left(\frac{D}{N}\right)\left(\frac{N-D}{N}\right)\left(\frac{N-n}{N-1}\right)Finite population NN; DD items of interest; size nn sampled without replacement.